Cases 1 - 10 of 741
M99 Studios, LLC v. Uzivert, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02568
Plaintiff:
M99 Studios, LLC
Defendant:
Uzivert, LLC, Symere Bysil Woods and Amina Diop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jackson v. Morris et al
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Kennin Dwayne Jackson
Defendant:
Deputy, Mr. Morris, Deputy, Mr. A. Wood, Deputy, Mr. Stearns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iacono v. Woods et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Aca Daniel Iacono
Defendant:
Captain Danny Woods, Sheriff Rick Kelley and Southern Health Partners Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Pierce County et al
as 5:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Davey Green
Defendant:
Pierce County, Charlie Wichman, Gregory Nettles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv02180
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Sgt. Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. WIZA
as 4:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Respondent:
Warden SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Iacono v. Woods et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Aca Daniel Iacono
Defendant:
Captain Danny Woods and Sargent Jenifer Kost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv01884
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vinton Woods LLC v. Brown
as 1:2024cv01823
Plaintiff:
Vinton Woods LLC
Defendant:
Anthony Brown
Petitioner:
Aris Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Cochran v. Wood et al
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Sheriff Lenn Wood, Major Eric Smith, Sgt Josh Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
