Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Mitchell v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv05118
Plaintiff:
Willie J Mitchell
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, The Fulton County Georgia, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITTED v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14031
Plaintiff:
JIM ARTHUR WHITTED
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WHITTED JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06087
Plaintiff:
HAROLD WHITTED JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WHITTED v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16313
Plaintiff:
DANE WHITTED
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WHITTED v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03124
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE NICKOLAS WHITTED
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whitted v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01939
Plaintiff:
Terry Whitted
Defendant:
Wal Mart Associates Inc and Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
WHITTED v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09311
Plaintiff:
RYAN JAMES WHITTED
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jose Iraheta v. Houston County Georgia, et al
as 22-10628
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE D. IRAHETA
Defendant / Appellee:
HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA, CULLEN TALTON, SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICINE and others
Scott v. Henry County Police Dept. et al
as 1:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
Terrence James Scott
Defendant:
Henry County Police Dept., L.T. J. Prescott, L.T. Whit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00330
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
