Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Piccadilly Holdings, II LLC et al v. Marshall et al
as 0:2023cv60977
Plaintiff:
Piccadilly Holdings, II LLC and William Bennett
Defendant:
Alex Marshall, NO-H20 USA. INC and Emmet O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Piccadilly Holdings II, LLC et al v. NO-H2O USA, INC. et al
as 0:2023cv60978
Plaintiff:
Piccadilly Holidngs II, LLC, William Bennett, Alex Marshall and others
Defendant:
NO-H2O USA, INC. and Emmet O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
BENNETT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17845
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BENNETT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crum et al v. GL NV24 Shipping, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tommy Crum, The Little Lloyd, LLC, David Marsh and others
Defendant:
GL NV24 Shipping, Inc., Hyundai Glovis Co., G-Marine Service Co., Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Blake v. Tyree et al
as 3:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
C. A. Tyree, Gwava, T. McDarby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demps v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
William Jamal Demps
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Mr. Hodgeson, Clara Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Bennett
as 7:2018cv00233
Plaintiff:
Seron Smith
Defendant:
William Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seron Smith v. William Bennett, et al
as 17-10138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SERON SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BENNETT, JOHN HUTTON, DEBRA TONEY and others
Smith v. Bennett et al
as 7:2016cv01745
Plaintiff:
Seron Smith
Defendant:
William Bennett, John Hutton, Willie Thomas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Bennett et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00728
Plaintiff:
Seron Smith
Defendant:
William Bennett, John Hutton, Willie Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
