Cases 1 - 10 of 2,820
Williams v. The City of Mobile, Alabama et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Wendy Williams
Defendant:
The City of Mobile, Alabama, Mobile Police Department and Chief of Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. Montgomery County and City Board et al
as 2:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kelly
Defendant:
Montgomery County and City Board doing business as Montgomery County and City Board ("MCCB"), John Baker, Andrea McCain and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery v. Birmingham, City of
as 2:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Wathaw Avery
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Billingham v. City of Florence Alabama et al
as 3:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Victor Billingham
Defendant:
City of Florence Alabama and Asplundh Tree Expert LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sewell v. Maddox et al
as 2:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Amy Giles Sewell
Defendant:
Thomas N Maddox, City of Elba, Alabama and Harold L. Staley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Le v. Mims et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Le
Defendant:
Beth Mims, City of Jemison and Rickey Patrick Self
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
