Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 62
USA ex rel Elizabeth Kennedy, et al v. Novo A/S, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-7062
Plaintiff: United States of America, ex rel. Elizabeth W. Kennedy, et al.
Interested Party: State of Minnesota, State of Rhode Island, State of Delaware and others
Defendant / Appellee: Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo A/S, Novo Nordisk Foundation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Elizabeth W. Kennedy
Environmental Defense Fund, et al v. James Owens, et al
as 20-1169
Petitioner: Center for Biological Diversity, Conservation Law Foundation, Public Citizen, Inc. and others
Intervenor: State of Minnesota, City and County of Denver, State of Vermont and others
Respondent: James C. Owens, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Elaine L. Chao, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
State of California, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 20-1167
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, James C. Owens, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and others
Petitioner: State of Colorado, City of Los Angeles, State of New Jersey and others
State of California, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 19-1239
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Elaine L. Chao, in her official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Transportation and others
Petitioner: State of Colorado, City of Los Angeles, State of New Jersey and others
State of New York, et al v. EPA
as 19-1165
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner: City of Boulder, (CO), City of South Miami, (FL), State of Colorado and others
Laurence Schneider, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National, et al
as 19-7025
Plaintiff: State of Iowa, ex rel. Laurence Schneider, United States of America, ex rel. Laurence Schneider, State of California, ex rel. Laurence Schneider and others
Defendant / Appellee: Chase Home Finance, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Plaintiff / Appellant: Laurence Schneider
Not Yet Classified: United States of America
Eddricco Brown-Bey v. State of North Carolina, et al
as 17-7089
Plaintiff - Appellant: Eddricco Li'shaun Brown-Bey
Defendant - Appellee: State of North Carolina, State of North Carolina Department of Public Safety, Director and State of North Carolina Department of Public Safety, Secretary
USA ex. re. Laurence Schneider, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-7003
Plaintiff: United States of America, ex rel. Laurence Robert Schneider, State of California, ex rel. Laurence Robert Schneider, State of Delaware, ex rel. Laurence Robert Schneider and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Laurence Robert Schneider
Defendant - Appellee: JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Chase Home Finance, LLC
White Stallion Energy Center v. EPA
as 12-1100
Intervenor: Chase Power Development, LLC, American Public Health Association, State of North Carolina and others
Amicus Curiae: American College of Chest Physicians, Richard J. Lazarus, Oliver A. Houck and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner: White Stallion Energy Center, LLC
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-1264
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: State of Connecticut, State of California, State of Illinois and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?