Cases 31 - 40 of 150
Environmental Defense Fund, et al v. James Owens, et al
as 20-1169
Petitioner:
Center for Biological Diversity, Conservation Law Foundation, Public Citizen, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
State of Minnesota, City and County of Denver, State of Vermont and others
Respondent:
James C. Owens, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Elaine L. Chao, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
State of California, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 20-1167
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, James C. Owens, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and others
Petitioner:
State of Colorado, City of Los Angeles, State of New Jersey and others
State of New York, et al v. EPA, et al
as 20-1164
Petitioner:
People of the State of Michigan, State of Vermont, State of California and others
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency and Susan Parker Bodine, as Assistant Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Coalition for Responsible Reg v. EPA
as 09-1322
Intervenor:
Michigan Manufacturers Association, Glass Packaging Institute, State of Utah and others
Petitioner:
Great Northern Project Development, L.P., Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc., Rosebud Mining Company and others
Amicus Curiae:
Nicola Scafetta, National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, James P. Wallace, III and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
State of California, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 19-1239
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Elaine L. Chao, in her official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Transportation and others
Petitioner:
State of Colorado, City of Los Angeles, State of New Jersey and others
State of California, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-1227
Petitioner:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator
State of New York, et al v. EPA
as 19-1165
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
City of Boulder, (CO), City of South Miami, (FL), State of Colorado and others
State of New York, et al v. DOL, et al
as 19-5125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
District of Columbia, State of Maryland, State of Washington and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, United States Department of Labor and R. Alexander Acosta, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
Amicus Curiae:
Lake Cities Chamber of Commerce, (Texas), State of Kentucky, by and through Governor Matt Bevin, Las Vegas Latin Chamber of Commerce, (Nevada) and others
Ricardo Lopez v. State of California, et al
as 19-7051
Defendant / Appellee:
Los Angeles County Registrar Recorder Office, Franchise Tax Board, State of California and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez, doing business as Starlight Consulting Services, doing business as Starlight Communications, doing business as Starlight Entertainment Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Starlight Music Management, Inc.
Laurence Schneider, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National, et al
as 19-7025
Plaintiff:
State of Iowa, ex rel. Laurence Schneider, United States of America, ex rel. Laurence Schneider, State of California, ex rel. Laurence Schneider and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Chase Home Finance, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Laurence Schneider
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
