Cases 11 - 20 of 33
FLORENDO-ONG v. IL-USA et al
as 1:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN FLORENDO-ONG
Defendant:
116th/117th US CONGRESSIONAL 535 MEMBERS, 177 MEMBERS IL G.A., CECILIA ABUNDIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DOE v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022mc00034
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and CHRISTINE ELIZABETH WORMUTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHURCH et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02815
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CHURCH, LESLEY CHURCH, ALMA GONZALEZ and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, LLOYD J. AUSTIN III, ANTONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COSTIN et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02484
Plaintiff:
GREGG COSTIN, DANIEL SCHULTZ, CASSIDY HOLLOWELL and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, LLOYD AUSTIN and LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
WEIDRICK v. BIDEN, JR. et al
as 1:2021cv02224
Plaintiff:
MARY JO WEIDRICK
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., UNITED STATES MILITARY, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2021cv00752
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, DAN CALDWELL, CHRIS BRUYN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SARHAN and BARBARA STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
PERRY et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv00548
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, JOE BIDEN and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEIDRICK v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv00416
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CONGRESS and JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR.
Plaintiff:
MARY JO WEIDRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Jones v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 17-5188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Matthew N.P. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr. and Office of the Vice President
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
