Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 111 - 120 of 250
Brian Wrenn, et al v. DC, et al
as 16-7025
Plaintiff / Appellant: Brian Wrenn, Tyler Whidby, Joshua Akery and others
Amicus Curiae: DC Vote, State of Washington, DC Appleseed Center for Law & Justice and others
Defendant / Appellee: Peter Newsham, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Metropolitan Police Department, District of Columbia and Cathy L. Lanier, in her personal capacity as Former Chief of Police for the Metropolitan Police Department
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00199
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant: HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC. , HSBC BANK USA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , HSBC FINANCE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Murray Energy Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 15-1396
Petitioner: Murray Energy Corporation
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: Lignite Energy Council and Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
Energy & Environment Legal Ins v. EPA
as 15-1397
Petitioner: Energy & Environment Legal Institute
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: Lignite Energy Council and Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor: American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae: William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
State of North Dakota v. EPA
as 15-1381
Petitioner: State of North Dakota
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: American Lung Association, Center for Biological Diversity, Clean Air Council and others
SATTERLEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01387
Plaintiff: RONALD LEROY SATTERLEE
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, FIRST HOME SAVINGS BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Brian Wrenn, et al v. DC, et al
as 15-7057
Plaintiff / Appellee: Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., Joshua Akery, Brian Wrenn and others
Amicus Curiae: Everytown for Gun Safety, State of California, D.C. Vote and others
Defendant / Appellant: Cathy L. Lanier and District of Columbia
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. SYSCO CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00256
Defendant: SYSCO CORPORATION, USF HOLDING CORP. and US FOODS, INC.
Plaintiff: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Interested Party: DISTRIBUTION MARKET ADVANTAGE, CHENEY BROTHERS, INC., CULVER FRANCHISING SYSTEM, INC. and others
3Rd Party Defendant: HPSI PURCHASING SERVICES
Petitioner: XYZ CORPORATION, FOODBUY, LLC and COMPASS GROUP USA, INC.
Amicus Curiae: PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP, INC.
Intervenor: REINHART FOODSERVICE, L.L.C. and SHAMROCK FOODS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 53 b Federal Trade Commission Act
COBB v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00176
Plaintiff: DONALD L. COBB
Defendant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, METRO TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?