Cases 11 - 20 of 91
USA v. Clifford Bogle
as 20-3085
Defendant / Appellant:
Clifford Theophilus Bogle
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 19-5014
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, Rice Pichon, BJ Fadem and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao, Esquire, Attorney and Yi Tai Shao
DAY JR. v. HASKETT et al
as 1:2020cv00806
Defendant:
CLIFFORD JOHNSON, GENARO GARCIA LUNA, PATRICIA ESPINOZA CANTELLANO and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER CHARLES DAY JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLEETWOOD et al v. HICKENLOOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00872
Defendant:
STEVE FEELEY, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS, JONATHAN SHAW and others
Plaintiff:
FLEETWOOD FREIGHT LINES COMPANY, AMERICAN FREEDOM CONCERTS COMPANY, CLIFFORD G. FLEETWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MAKHMALBAF v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv01183
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CONSULATE, Stockholm, Sweden and others
Plaintiff:
RAHELEH MAKHMALBAF
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
SIMS v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv00345
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
Clifford David Sims and CLIFTON DAVID SIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BRODY v. PUBLIC STORAGE et al
as 1:2018cv01623
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD L. BRODY
Defendant:
CLINTON MARKWELL, JOSEPH D. RUSSELL, LILY Y. HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SHAO v. KENNEDY et al
as 1:2018cv01233
Plaintiff:
YI TAI SHAO
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHUETT v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2018cv00296
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD JAMES SCHUETT
Defendant:
JEFFERY ALLEN and MARK S. INCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
