Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 92
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1081
Petitioner: State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae: The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified: ConservAmerica
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1399
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition, Calpine Corporation, Lignite Energy Council and others
Amicus Curiae: Technological Innovation Experts, Nicholas Ashford, M. Granger Morgan, Edward S. Rubin, and Margaret Taylor, Carbon Capture and Storage Scientists, Roger Aines, Sally Benson, S. Julio Friedmann, Jon Gibbins, Raghubir Gupta, Howard Herzog, Susan Hovorka, Meagan Mauter, Ah-Hyung (Alissa) Park, Gary Rochelle and Jennifer Wilcox and Saskatchew Power Corporation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court: STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant: NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner: AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent: BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor: American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae: William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
State of Iowa, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-1144
Petitioner: State of Iowa, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
State of Georgia, et al v. DOJ
as 23-5083
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Georgia and Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State, in his official capacity
Defendant / Appellant: United States Department of Justice
THOMAS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2022cv03547
Plaintiff: WILBERT THOMAS
Defendant: STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sur Green, III, et al v. State of Georgia, et al
as 22-7139
Plaintiff / Appellant: Sur Harry Green, III and Cynthia Sur Green, III
Defendant / Appellee: State of Georgia, "we" the people INC or LLC, Dooly County Sheriff, independent INC or LLC, John Shedd, Lt. "associates" INC or INC and others
GREEN et al v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02455
Defendant: MARY VALDIVEZ, STATE OF GEORGIA, DOOLY COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Plaintiff: SUR HARRY GREEN, III and CYNTHIA SUR GREEN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STATE OF GEORGIA et al v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv03138
Plaintiff: STATE OF GEORGIA and BRAD RAFFENSPERGER
Defendant: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?