Cases 21 - 30 of 189
Weih Chang, et al v. Unnamed OVW Grantees And VAWA, et al
as 21-5145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gordon Gene Smith, Individually and as Taxpayers, and on behalf of a Class of others similarly situated and Weih Steve Chang
Defendant / Appellee:
Laura L. Rogers, Office on Violence Against Women and Unnamed OVW Grantees and VAWA Coodinators, Private and Governmental, in their individual and official capacities, jointly and severally
SONDLAND v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2021cv01405
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. POMPEO and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
GORDON D. SONDLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon Price v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 21-5073
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States of America, Shawn Benge, in his official capacity as Deputy Director Exercising the Authority of Director of the National Park Service and Debra A. Haaland, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Gordon M. Price
Theodore Wesby, et al v. DC, et al
as 20-7117
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia, Andre Parker, Officer - Metropolitan Police Department, in both his official and individual capacities, J. Newman, Officer - Metropolitan Police Department, in both his official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sidney A. Banks, Jr., Alissa Cole, James Davis and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Antoinette Colbert, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ethelbert D. Louis
Interested Party:
Gregory L. Lattimer
VAN-KUSH v. 10TH CIRCUIT EXECUTIVE/ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE JUDGES (AO) et al
as 1:2020cv02879
Plaintiff:
RYAN SASHA-SHAI VAN-KUSH
Defendant:
10TH CIRCUIT EXECUTIVE/ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE JUDGES (AO), US COURTS, GORDON P. GALLAGHER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
VAN KUSH v. 10TH CIRCUIT EXECUTIVE/ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE JUDGES (AO) et al
as 1:2020cv02862
Defendant:
10TH CIRCUIT EXECUTIVE/ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE JUDGES (AO), GORDON P. GALLAGHER, US COURTS and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN SASHA-SHAI VAN KUSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Kevin Mccarthy, et al v. Nancy Pelosi, et al
as 20-5240
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy Pelosi, The Honorable, in her official capacity as Speaker of the House of Representatives and Member of the United States House of Representatives for the California 12th Congressional District, Cheryl L. Johnson, The Honorable, in her official capacity as Clerk of the United States House of Representatives and Paul D. Irving, in his official capacity as Sergeant-at-Arms of the United States House of Representatives
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David S. Schweikert, The Honorable, in his official capacity as Member of the United States House of Representatives for the Arizona 6th Congressional District, Kevin Owen Mccarthy, The Honorable, in his official capacity as House Minority Leader and Member of the United States House of Representatives for the California 23rd Congressional District, James Shipley Swayze and others
Amicus Curiae:
Individual Rights Foundation, Reason Foundation and Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence
MCCARTHY et al v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2020cv01395
Plaintiff:
ANDREW PETER HARRIS, GLEN CLAY HIGGINS, MICKIE J. NILAND and others
Defendant:
CHERYL L. JOHNSON, NANCY PELOSI and PAUL D. IRVING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
SHAIVITE TEMPLE v. 10TH CIRCUIT EXECUTIVE/ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE JUDGES et al
as 1:2020cv00476
Defendant:
GORDON P. GALLAGHER, US COURTS, 10TH CIRCUIT EXECUTIVE/ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE JUDGES and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN SASHA-SHAI VAN KUSH and SHAIVITE TEMPLE FEIN #37-1949939
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DAWABSHEH FAMILY et al v. NETANYAHU et al
as 1:2020cv00555
Defendant:
BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, DONALD HIKIND, JARED KUSHNER and others
Plaintiff:
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DAWABSHEH FAMILY, JOHN HEALY, HIBA BARGHOUTHI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
