Cases 21 - 30 of 57
DEMOS v. U.S.A. et al
as 1:2019cv02381
Respondent:
WASHINGTON, D.C., STATE OF WASHINGTON and U.S.A.
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Demos, Jr. v. United States Washington D.C., et al
as 19-5158
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Washington D.C., United States Attorney General, United States of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
SHEPHARD v. WRAY et al
as 1:2019cv01810
Defendant:
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., DICK CHENEY, SHERROD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMOS v. THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON D.C. et al
as 1:2019cv00253
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON D.C., THE U.S. SOLICITOR GENERAL, PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERTS DEMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCHEIDLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00373
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SCHEIDLER
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JANE AND JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MILNER v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2018cv02782
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS and UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Plaintiff:
JOHN MILNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARD v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2018cv00851
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, ANTHONY KENNEDY, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEPHARD v. GRAHAM et al
as 1:2017cv02853
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Defendant:
LINDSEY GRAHAM, DICK DURBIN, PATRICK LEAHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
R. Johnson v. John Roberts, et al
as 17-5200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
John Roberts, Chief Judge, C. Thomas, Kennedy, Justice and others
JOHNSON v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2017cv00777
Plaintiff:
R. WAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, C. THOMAS, KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
