Cases 21 - 30 of 856
JONES v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv03576
Plaintiff:
JULIANNE JONES
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
ADAMKAVICIUS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv03571
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ADAMKAVICIUS, JOYCE MEHRER, KEVIN MEHRER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Catherine Jones v. WMATA
as 23-7157
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Catherine Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
JONES v. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART P. C.
as 1:2023cv03488
Plaintiff:
AMOS N. JONES
Defendant:
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART P. C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JONES v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv03368
Plaintiff:
JULIANNE JONES
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
HILLS v. MASON et al
as 1:2023cv03157
Plaintiff:
ROLAND HILLS
Defendant:
CHERYL L. MASON, KENNETH A. ARNOLD, JAIME AREIZAGA-SOTO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BURRESS-EL v. DUKE ENERGY, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02967
Plaintiff:
ANTUAN BURRESS-EL
Defendant:
ROCCO O. D'ASENZO, BOB MCMAHON, LARISA M. VAYSMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HEMPHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02865
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL ANTIONE HEMPHILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, JULIAN CASTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv02616
Plaintiff:
ANDREA JONES
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
