Cases 21 - 30 of 81
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. FACEBOOK, INC.
as 1:2020cv03589
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
STATE OF ALABAMA et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
as 1:2020cv03551
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC agent of d/b/a MR. COOPER and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC doing business as MR. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
USA ex rel Elizabeth Kennedy, et al v. Novo A/S, et al
as 20-7062
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Elizabeth W. Kennedy, et al.
Interested Party:
State of Minnesota, State of Rhode Island, State of Delaware and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo A/S, Novo Nordisk Foundation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Elizabeth W. Kennedy
Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc., et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 20-5174
Defendant / Appellee:
Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc., Sierra Club and Lead Agency, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma and others
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. DEVOS et al
as 1:2020cv01468
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant:
ELISABETH DEVOS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, AASA, SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT'S ASSOCIATION and others
Petitioner:
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S LAW CENTER and SPEECH FIRST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG et al
as 1:2019cv02232
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF KANSAS and others
Defendant:
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP., T-MOBILE US, INC., DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG and others
Amicus Curiae:
NEW AMERICA'S OPEN TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE, HAL SINGER, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Petitioner:
NTCH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
American Lung Association, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-1140
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator
Petitioner:
American Lung Association and American Public Health Association
Intervenor:
State of Kansas, Phil Bryant, Governor of the State of Mississippi, State of Texas and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
State of New York, et al v. DOL, et al
as 19-5125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
District of Columbia, State of Maryland, State of Washington and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, United States Department of Labor and R. Alexander Acosta, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
Amicus Curiae:
Lake Cities Chamber of Commerce, (Texas), State of Kentucky, by and through Governor Matt Bevin, Las Vegas Latin Chamber of Commerce, (Nevada) and others
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01132
Plaintiff:
FRED SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
