Cases 31 - 40 of 448
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv01331
Plaintiff:
XUE LIU, ZHENGHONG GAO and NO PARTY
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, TERRI ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MARTIN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
LINDA MARTIN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and CHRISTOPHER WRAY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00769
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
MANG v. WRAY
as 1:2023cv00553
Petitioner:
ROBERT MANG
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BREWER v. WRAY et al
as 1:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY, KIMBERLY CHEATLE, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
FUENTES v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv03106
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS FUENTES
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., MERRICK GARLAND, CHRISTOPHER WRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
