Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 119
In re: FBOP Execution Protocol Cases
as 20-5199
Plaintiff / Appellee: Richard Tipton, Daniel Lewis Lee, Brandon Bernard and others
Not Yet Classified: Jeffrey Paul, Orlando Hall, Bruce Webster and others
Defendant / Appellant: Jeffrey E. Krueger, Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, North Central Region, Nicole C. English, Assistant Director, Health Services, Federal Bureau of Prisons, William E. Wilson, M.D., Clinical Director, U.S. Penitentiary Terre Haute and others
In Re: In re: In the Matter of the Federal Bureau of Prisons' Execution Protocol Cases
BLACK LIVES MATTER D.C. et al v. TRUMP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01469
Defendant: GREGORY T. MONAHAN, WILLIAM J. WALKER, JAMES C. MCCONVILLE and others
Plaintiff: GARRETT BOND, J.N.C., KISHON MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
IN RE MATTER OF CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE AND CIVIL FORFEITURE PROCEEDINGS
as 1:2020mc00025
In Re: IN RE MATTER OF CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE AND CIVIL FORFEITURE PROCEEDINGS
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA et al v. FERRIERO We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00242
Defendant: DAVID S. FERRIERO
Plaintiff: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE OF NEVADA and STATE OF ILLINOIS
Petitioner: NEBRASKA, LOUISIANA, ALABAMA and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF HAWAII, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Not Classified By Court: LEANNE LITTRELL DILORENZO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cross Refined Coal, LLC, et al v. Cmsnr. IRS
as 20-1015
Respondent: Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Interested Party: AJG Coal, Inc. and Schneider Electric USA, Inc., Successor in Interest to Schneider Electric Investments 2, Inc.
Petitioner: USA Refined Coal, LLC, Tax Matters Partner and Cross Refined Coal, LLC
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and National Mining Association
IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE CELLULAR TELEPHONE ASSIGNED CALL NUMBER 202-704-0791, THAT IS STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY AT&T
as 1:2020sc00010
In Re: IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE CELLULAR TELEPHONE ASSIGNED CALL NUMBER 202-704-0791, THAT IS STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY AT&T
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION OF ELEANOR DE LEON et al v. NORTHRIDGE CAPITAL, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019mc00197
Petitioner: ELEANOR DE LEON
Respondent: NORTHRIDGE CAPITAL, LLC and COHN REZNICK LLP
In Re: IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION OF ELEANOR DE LEON
IN RE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION TO ENFORCE AN ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENA
as 1:2019mc00188
Respondent: CODY M. WILSON
Petitioner: COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
In Re: MATTER OF AN APPLICATION TO ENFORCE AN ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENA
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC, et al
as 1:2019mc00174
In Re: IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC,
Petitioner: ASSOCIATED PRESS, NEW YORK TIMES CO, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and others
Interested Party: MICHAEL T. FLYNN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019mc00145
Defendant: CHADRICK EVAN FULKS, PAUL LAIRD, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Plaintiff: ALFRED BOURGEOIS, JULIUS ROBINSON, JAMES H. ROANE, JR., and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BRUCE WEBSTER, ANTHONY BATTLE and ORLANDO HALL
Intervenor Defendant: RICHARD VEACH
Intervenor: JEFFREY PAUL
In Re: IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?