Cases 61 - 70 of 351
City of Boston, Massachusetts, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-1301
Petitioner:
City of Piedmont, California, Howard County, Maryland, City of Gaithersburg, Maryland and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Kevin Mccarthy, et al v. Nancy Pelosi, et al
as 20-5240
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy Pelosi, The Honorable, in her official capacity as Speaker of the House of Representatives and Member of the United States House of Representatives for the California 12th Congressional District, Cheryl L. Johnson, The Honorable, in her official capacity as Clerk of the United States House of Representatives and Paul D. Irving, in his official capacity as Sergeant-at-Arms of the United States House of Representatives
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David S. Schweikert, The Honorable, in his official capacity as Member of the United States House of Representatives for the Arizona 6th Congressional District, Kevin Owen Mccarthy, The Honorable, in his official capacity as House Minority Leader and Member of the United States House of Representatives for the California 23rd Congressional District, James Shipley Swayze and others
Amicus Curiae:
Individual Rights Foundation, Reason Foundation and Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence
BERGERON v. HACKER et al
as 1:2020cv01864
Defendant:
FREEMASONS OF THE UNITED STATES, J. BRITT JOHNSON, UNKNOWN AGENTS OF THE GEORGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff:
JACOB ANDREW BERGERON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA ex rel Elizabeth Kennedy, et al v. Novo A/S, et al
as 20-7062
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Elizabeth W. Kennedy, et al.
Interested Party:
State of Minnesota, State of Rhode Island, State of Delaware and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo A/S, Novo Nordisk Foundation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Elizabeth W. Kennedy
American Hospital Association, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 20-5193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Association of American Medical Colleges, National Association of Children's Hospitals, Bothwell Regional Health Center and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services
Amicus Curiae:
The Connecticut Hospital Association, The Texas Hospital Association, The Healthcare Association of Hawaii and others
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. DEVOS et al
as 1:2020cv01468
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant:
ELISABETH DEVOS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, AASA, SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT'S ASSOCIATION and others
Petitioner:
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S LAW CENTER and SPEECH FIRST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Rose Duru v. United States Government, et al
as 20-5109
Defendant / Appellee:
Arthur M. Southam, M.D., Nathalia Cimbolti, Outreach Specialist, Bernard J. Tyson and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rose Adanma Duru
DURU v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00649
Defendant:
ANGELA D. CAESAR, GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, CLERK'S OFFICE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
as 1:2020mc00008
Plaintiff:
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY LLC, AK STEEL CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
In Re:
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
Interested Party:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, CVR ENERGY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
DE LA FUENTE v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv03753
Defendant:
Arizona Republican Party, Georgia Republican Party, Washington Republican Party and others
Plaintiff:
ROQUE DE LA FUENTE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
