Cases 81 - 90 of 366
DUDA v. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2020cv03510
Defendant:
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
KELLY DUDA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03352
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03475
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03472
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03203
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. KELLY et al
as 1:2020cv03073
Plaintiff:
HELENE TONIQUE WILLIAMS and TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER
Defendant:
HONORABLE ROBIN KELLY, UNITED STATES and ROBIN KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2020cv02710
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH
Amicus Curiae:
KEVIN CRAMER, RAND PAUL, CINDY HYDE-SMITH and others
Interested Party:
USA UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02659
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Lawyers United Inc., et al v. USA, et al
as 20-5269
Defendant / Appellee:
Randy Smith, Judicial Circuit Judge, James M. Lorenz, District Judge, Mark Walker and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Evelyn Aimee DeJesus and Lawyers United Inc.
Not Yet Classified:
Allan Wainwright
BURTON v. CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES et al
as 1:2020cv02730
Defendant:
SUSANNA P. DILLER, KELLI BAILEY, JULIANA D. MARTINS and others
Plaintiff:
ADRIENNE HOWARD BURTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
