Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Alan Headman v. Clayton Higgins, Jr.
as 22-5132
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alan Headman
Defendant / Appellee:
Clayton R. Higgins, Jr.
HEADMAN v. HIGGINS
as 1:2022cv00952
Plaintiff:
ALAN HEADMAN
Defendant:
CLAYTON R. HIGGINS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charlotte Horst v. Clayton Higgins, Jr., et al
as 19-5253
Defendant / Appellee:
Supreme Court of the United States, Clayton R. Higgins, Jr., United States of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charlotte Horst, D.J.H., S.J.H., M.J.H., D.X.H.
Taquan Gullett v. James Duff, et al
as 19-5217
Defendant / Appellee:
James C. Duff, Inspector General, United States Department of Justice, United States of America, Personal private capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Taquan Gullett
HORST v. HIGGINS et al
as 1:2019cv02383
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE HORST
Defendant:
SCOTT S. HARRIS, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, CLAYTON R. HIGGINS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GULLETT v. DUFF et al
as 1:2019cv02015
Defendant:
SCOTT S. HARRIS, JAMES C. DUFF, WILLIAM P. BARR and others
Plaintiff:
TAQUAN GULLETT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
FULLER v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2017cv00876
Plaintiff:
JANCIS FULLER
Defendant:
SCOTT S. HARRIS and CLAYTON R. HIGGINS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWLFEATHER-GORBEY v. HIGGINS
as 1:2017mc00180
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant:
CLAYTON R. HIGGINS, JR.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
HOLIDAY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv00638
Defendant:
PUBLIC DEFENDER SERVICE, RUTH GENSBURGE, MELVIN R. WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
DAUD ABDULLAH HOLIDAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORBEY v. SUTTER et al
as 1:2015mc00133
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Respondent:
WILLIAM R SUTTER, CLAYTON R. HIGGINS, JR., U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
