Cases 1 - 10 of 31
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1399
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition, Calpine Corporation, Lignite Energy Council and others
Amicus Curiae:
Technological Innovation Experts, Nicholas Ashford, M. Granger Morgan, Edward S. Rubin, and Margaret Taylor, Carbon Capture and Storage Scientists, Roger Aines, Sally Benson, S. Julio Friedmann, Jon Gibbins, Raghubir Gupta, Howard Herzog, Susan Hovorka, Meagan Mauter, Ah-Hyung (Alissa) Park, Gary Rochelle and Jennifer Wilcox and Saskatchew Power Corporation
NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv00745
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM, NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER and ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
ROB RAWSON, ROSEMARIE HOWELL and TROY LAW, PLLC
Petitioner:
JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, DON KOZICH, REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS and others
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF ALTERNATIVE NEWS MEDIA, TULLY CENTER FOR FREE SPEECH, THOMAS BRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv01384
Plaintiff:
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER and SEATTLE CANCER CARE ALLIANCE
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
City of Seattle, Washington v. FERC
as 21-1129
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Petitioner:
City of Seattle, Washington
Children's Hospital Ass'n, et al v. Alex Azar, et al
as 18-5135
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Seattle Children's Hospital, Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, Children's Health Care, doing business as Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota and others
Amicus Curiae:
Children's Hospital Association
Defendant / Appellant:
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Alex Michael Azar, II, in his offical capacity, Secretary, Deparment of Health and Human Services, Thomas E. Price, in his offical capacity, Secretary, Deparment of Health and Human Services and others
City of Seattle, Washington, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-1300
Petitioner:
City of Concord, California, City of Napa, California, City of Richmond, California and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS et al v. PRICE et al
as 1:2017cv00844
Plaintiff:
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, GILLETTE CHILDREN'S SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE, CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF THE KING'S DAUGHTERS, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant:
SEEMA VERMA, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES and THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
City of Chicago, Illinois, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-1226
Petitioner:
King County, Washington, City of St. Paul, MN, City of Olympia, Washington and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL et al v. BURWELL et al
as 1:2014cv02060
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, MARILYN B. TAVENNER and CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES
Plaintiff:
TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL and SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
