Cases 161 - 170 of 1,048
Kenneth Hill v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 19-16365
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, Y. AYALA, M. VOONG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH HILL
Church et al v. Kernan et al
as 1:2019cv00915
Defendant:
Richard Tait, Robert Brewster, Luke Bostick and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Church, Jr. and Judy Ronningen Church
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Sharonoff v. Tyler et al
as 2:2019cv01239
Defendant:
Thomas Tyler, Scott Kernan and Scott Fraueheim
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allen Sharonoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick L Johnson v. Superior Court of The State of California, County of Los Angeles
as 2:2019cv05713
Petitioner:
Derrick L Johnson
Respondent:
Superior Court of the State of California County of Los Angeles, Scott Kernan, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner v. Newsom et al
as 1:2019cv00338
Respondent:
William Joe Sullivan, Scott Kernan, Siannah Collado and others
Petitioner:
Steven Deon Turner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zane Hubbard v. M. Stainer, et al
as 19-16271
Defendant / Appellee:
R. GOODWIN, M. D. STAINER, SCOTT KERNAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZANE HUBBARD
(PC) Johnson v. Lozano et al
as 2:2019cv01128
Defendant:
Larry Lesane, Perez, Scott Kernan and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine L Johnson and Antoine L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Martinez v. Lewis et al
as 1:2019cv00812
Defendant:
C. Pfeiffer, J. Lewis and Scott Kernan
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hammler v. The State of California et al
as 1:2019cv00785
Defendant:
Cervantes, Scott Kernan, Baraona and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hammler v. Cota et al
as 1:2019cv00783
Defendant:
I. Salcedo, J. Hubbard, M. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
