Cases 31 - 40 of 182
MORGAN v. USA
as 1:2022cv01090
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MORGAN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Arunachalam v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 22-2121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., SAP AMERICA, INC. and others
SCHERER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00558
Petitioner:
KEVIN SCHERER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
HECKATHORN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00550
Petitioner:
KEVIN HECKATHORN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
RICHARDSON v. USA
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RICHARDSON and DANIEL BEARD
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
WangIn re: Wang
as 22-1518
Appellant:
In re: KEVIN SUNLIN WANG
Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
In re: Wang
as 22-1510
Appellant:
In re: KEVIN SUNLIN WANG
Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Correll v. Hirshfeld
as 22-1420
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN P. CORRELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Nation v. US
as 22-1256
Plaintiff:
MARK WAYNE NATION, MICHAEL JOE HORTON, KENNETH DESHAWN EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD RODRICK MACDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
