Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hyde Rhodes v. Wilcox
as 24-1224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM HYDE RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE JEFFREY WILCOX, JUDGE JAY WINWARD, STATE OF UTAH and others
Hyde Rhodes v. Wilcox
as 24-1227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM HYDE RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE JEFFREY WILCOX and JUDGE JAY WINWARD
Hyde Rhodes v. Horn
as 24-1228
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM HYDE RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT HORN, JEFFREY WILCOX, WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Hyde Rhodes v. Wilcox
as 24-1229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM HYDE RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE JEFFREY WILCOX, JUDGE JAY WINWARD and STATE OF UTAH
WILCOX v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01752
Petitioner:
SUSAN WILCOX
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 14-1335
Amicus Curiae:
CARROLL GANTZ, RALPH D. CLIFFORD, JOSEPH M. BALLAY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Plaintiff / Appellee:
APPLE INC., a California Corporation
ALAMO et al v. USA
as 1:2013cv00211
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALAMO , EMMETT BRANNEN , WILLIAM BREZENSKI and others
Defendant:
USA
WILCOX et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00875
Petitioner:
DANA WILCOX and MEGAN WILCOX
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
WILCOX et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00268
Petitioner:
BLAKE WILCOX , LEAH WILCOX and ALEXANDER GREY WILCOX
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
WILCOX V MORGAN
as 09-1340
Respondent-Appellee:
James L. Morgan, Warden
Petitioner-Appellant:
Norbert Steven Wilcox
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
