Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Henneghan v. Bowser
as 25-1273
Defendant:
PAMELA A. SMITH, Chief of Police for the Metropolitan Police Department, MURIEL BOWSER, Mayor of the District of Columbia, TIMOTHY W. SPRINGGS, Director of the District of Columbia Department of Public Works and others
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS HENNEGHAN and TIMOTHY HENNEGHAN
Henneghan v. Bowser
as 25-1274
Defendant:
BRIAN SCHWALB, Attorney General of the District of Columbia, PAMELA A. SMITH, Chief of Police for the Metropolitan Police Department, MURIEL BOWSER, Mayor of the District of Columbia and others
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS HENNEGHAN and TIMOTHY HENNEGHAN
BEDWELL v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv01938
Petitioner:
PAMELA BEDWELL
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024vv01904
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Bennett v. US
as 25-1171
Defendant:
CIELO HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., JACQUELINE STERN, Judge, JAMES JUDGE, Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BENNETT and PAMELA BENNETT
BALL et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv01761
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. BALL, III, GEORGIAANN G. BALL, JOHN P. CRISMAN and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
State of Mississippi v. US
as 25-1004
Plaintiff:
JAMES KELLEY WILLIAMS REVOCABLE TRUST UAD 1991, CLIFFORD CALHOUN WILLIAMS, GAIL E. GAIENNIE and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Messal v. Department of Agriculture
as 24-1850
Petitioner:
PAMELA MESSAL
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Messal v. Department of Agriculture
as 24-1817
Petitioner:
PAMELA MESSAL
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
KAHN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00644
Petitioner:
PAMELA KAHN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
