Cases 131 - 140 of 212
The Nassar Family Irrevocable v. Shulman
as 17-412
Plaintiff:
Nassar Family Irrevocable Trust, As nominee for Albert D. Nassar, Alyse C. Nassar, Albert C. Nassar and others
Appellant:
Albert D. Nassar, Individually, As Trustee of The Nassar Family Irrevocable Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Douglas H. Shulman, solely in his capacity as the Commissioner of the United States Internal Revenue Service
Creazioni Artistiche Musicali, v. Carlin America, Inc.
as 17-266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Creazioni Artistiche Musicali, S.r.l.
Defendant - Appellee:
Carlin America, Inc. and Edward B. Marks Music Company
Defendant:
John Does 1-10
The National Retirement Fund v. Caesars Entertainment
as 17-249
Plaintiff - Appellee:
The National Retirement Fund, each on behalf of the Legacy Plan of the National Retirement Fund and Richard N. Rust, in his capacity as Fund Manager, each on behalf of the Legacy Plan of the National Retirement Fund
Defendant:
John Does, 1-10 all other trades or businesses under common control with Caesars Entertainment Corporation and Caesars Entertainment Resort Properties, LLC that have not filed for bankruptcy
Defendant - Appellant:
Caesars Entertainment Corporation and Caesars Entertainment Resort Properties, LLC
In re: Aluminum Warehousing An
as 16-4305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Claridge Products and Equipment, Incorporated, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Custom Aluminum Products Incoroprated, Ampal Incorporated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Metro International Trade Services, L.L.C., Pacorini Metals USA, LLC, Henry Bath LLC and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Does 1-10, inclusive, Unidentified Parties and others
Eastman Kodak Company v. Goldman Sachs Group
as 16-4230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eastman Kodak Company, AGFA Corporation, AGFA Graphics NV and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Henry Bath LLC, Metro International Trade Services, L.L.C., JP Morgan Chase & Co. and others
Defendant:
Pacorini Metals AG, London Metal Exchange Limited, London Metal Exchange Limited and others
Harnage v. Murphy
as 16-4039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James A. Harnage
Defendant - Appellee:
Brian K. Murphy, Anthony Coletti, Meyers, Lieutenant and others
Wiles v. City of New York
as 16-3940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joshua Wiles
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, a municipal entity, Pastula, New York City Police Officer, Sergeant John Slayne, New York Police Department and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, New York City Police Officers
The National Retirement Fund v. Caesars Entertainment
as 16-3939
Plaintiff - Appellee:
The National Retirement Fund, each on behalf of the Legacy Plan of the National Retirement Fund and Richard N. Rust, in his capacity as Fund Manager, each on behalf of the Legacy Plan of the National Retirement Fund
Defendant:
John Does, 1-10 all other trades or businesses under common control with Caesars Entertainment Corporation and Caesars Entertainment Resort Properties, LLC that have not filed for bankruptcy
Defendant - Appellant:
Caesars Entertainment Corporation and Caesars Entertainment Resort Properties, LLC
Klipsch Group, Inc. v. Big box Store Limited
as 16-3726
Plaintiff:
ABC
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Klipsch Group, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
EPRO E-Commerce Limited, DBA DealExtreme, DBA Dealextreme.com, DBA DX, DBA Dx.com
Defendant:
DEF, Big Box Store Limited, DBA Bigboxstore.com, DBA Bigboxsave.com, Zhongren Cao, DBA United Pacific Connections Company, DBA Atechport.com, DBA Wirelessspycamera.biz and others
Klipsch Group, Inc. v. Big box Store Limited, et al
as 16-3637
Plaintiff:
ABC
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Klipsch Group, Inc.
Defendant:
DEF, Big Box Store Limited, DBA Bigboxstore.com, DBA Bigboxsave.com, Zhongren Cao, DBA United Pacific Connections Company, DBA Atechport.com, DBA Wirelessspycamera.biz and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
EPRO E-Commerce Limited, DBA DealExtreme, DBA Dealextreme.com, DBA DX, DBA Dx.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
