Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Kaluza v. Herron
as 11-1945
Petitioner - Appellant:
Joseph Stanislov Kaluza
Respondent - Appellee:
Martin D. Herron, Director of Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Michael T. Phillips, ICE Field Office Director and Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Adekoya v. Herron
as 11-1637
Petitioner - Appellant:
Prince Kayode Adekoya
Respondent - Appellee:
Martin D. Herron, Warden/Facility Director, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Adekoya v. Herron
as 10-5087
Petitioner - Appellant:
Prince A.Z.K. Adekoya, II
Respondent - Appellee:
Martin Herron, Warden/Facility Director Varick Federal Detentionm Center (VFDF), Michael Phillips, in his official capacity As New York City Field Office Director for Detention and Removal, New York District Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, John T. Morton, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and others
Johnson v. Holder
as 10-3727
Petitioner - Appellant:
Cornelius Anthony Johnson
Respondent - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S Attorney General, Sean Gallagher, Field Director, Juanita Hester, Assistance Director and others
Arthur v. DHS/ICE
as 10-2170
Petitioner - Appellant:
Alberto Arthur
Respondent - Appellee:
DHS/ICE, Terrance P. Flynn, District Attorney General of Buffalo NY, Carol G. Bridge, Assistant Chief and others
Thompson v. Holder
as 10-1757
Petitioner - Appellant:
Milton Thompson
Respondent - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General, Martine Herron, Warden Buffalo Federal Detention Center and Michael Philip, ICE Field Director
Brito v. Castillo
as 10-1388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bartolome Brito
Defendant - Appellee:
Gloria Herron Arthur, Attorney at Law, Individually and in Official Capacity and Gaspar M. Castillo, Attorney at Law, Individually and in Official Capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
