Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Rosa v. Cook
as 23-8026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant / Appellee:
ROLLIN COOK, sued in monetary damages through their individual capacities and in injunctive relief through their official capacities, WILLIAM MULLIGAN, sued in monetary damages through their individual capacities and in injunctive relief through their official capacities, BARONE, Warden, sued in monetary damages through their individual capacities and in injunctive relief through their official capacities and others
Tanvir v. Comey
as 23-738
Plaintiff:
Awais Sajjad
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Muhammad Tanvir, Jameel Algibhah and Naveed Shinwari
Defendant / Appellee:
James Comey, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, "John" Tanzin, Special Agent, FBI, Sanya Garcia, Special Agent FBI and others
Defendant:
Rand Beers, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, John S. Pistole, Administrator, Transportation Security Administration, Christopher M. Piehota, Director, Terrorist Screening Center and others
Harnage v. Shari
as 22-1881
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James A. Harnage
Defendant / Appellee:
Sreelakshmi Reddivari, Intern, AKA Shari
Defendant:
Shari, Intern, Dr. David Giles, John Does, 1-6 and others
Rodriguez v. New York City
as 21-2709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Rodriguez
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City, New York City Police Department, New York County and others
Jeanty v. City of Utica
as 21-1974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vladimir Jeanty
Defendant / Appellee:
Police Officer Michael Cerminario, badge #1301, individually and in his official capacity, City of Utica, Mark Williams, Chief of Police, Utica Police Department; individually and in his official capacity and others
Defendant:
John Doe #7, Corporation Counsel, City of Utica, individually and in his official capacity, Honorable Scott D. McNamara, Oneida County District Attorney, individually and in his official capacity, Grant Garramone, Assistant District Attorney, individually and in his official capacity and others
Snitzer v. The Board of Trustees of the A
as 20-3228
Defendant / Appellee:
Bill Thomas, Raymond M. Hair, Jr., Alan H. Raphael and others
Defendant:
Lovie Smith-Wright, Maureen B. Kilkelly, Elliot H. Greene and others
Appellant:
Martin Stoner
Plaintiff:
Andrew Snitzer, individually and as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons, on behalf of the American Federation o Musicians and Employers' Pension Plan and Paul Livant, individually and as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons, on behalf of the American Federation o Musicians and Employers' Pension Plan
King v. United States of America
as 20-1309
Defendant / Appellee:
Matthew Lew, United States Immigration and Custom Enforcement Agent, individually and in his official capacity, Scott North, Patricia White, United States Immigration and Custom Enforcement Agent, individually and in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wilfred MacDonald King
Moon v. Moon
as 20-168
Defendant / Appellee:
John Does 1-6, Ki Hoon Kim, Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hyung Jin Moon, "Sean"
Pierce v. City of New York
as 19-1557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lerin Pierce
Defendant / Appellee:
P.O. Mercado, P.O. Belardo and City of New York
Defendant:
P.O. Taqi, John Does 1-6 and John Does 1-3
Jeanty v. City of Utica
as 17-2909
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vladimir Jeanty
Defendant - Appellee:
Investigator Peter Paladino, badge #6290, individually and in his official capacity, Lieutenant Sean Dougherty, badge #2553, individually and in his official capacity, Mark Williams, Chief of Police, Utica Police Department; individually and in his official capacity and others
Defendant:
John Doe, #1-6, individually and in their capacity and John Doe #7, Corporation Counsel, City of Utica, individually and in his official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
