Cases 21 - 30 of 298
Jones v. Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital et al
as 9:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
Jonnie Jones
Defendant:
Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital, Champlain Valley Medical Department, Michael B. McMahon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freedom Mortgage Corporation v. Jones et al
as 6:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Shelby Jones, Scott Weaver and Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jones v. Tope
as 9:2023cv00415
Petitioner:
Daniel Jones
Respondent:
Danielle Tope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
Darrell Merrill Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. The Village of Catskill et al
as 1:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Justin Jones
Defendant:
The Village of Catskill, Mark Nazi, Daniel Goldpaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. McGuinness
as 9:2023cv00077
Petitioner:
Andrew Jones
Respondent:
T. McGuinness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Jones
as 9:2022cv01404
Petitioner:
Christopher E. Robinson
Respondent:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Osman v. Jones
as 9:2022cv01296
Petitioner:
Salad Osman
Respondent:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
