Cases 51 - 60 of 91
The United States Of America et al vs Bayer Diagnostics Corp.
as 1:2011cv00181
Defendant:
Bayer Diagnostics Corp, Davita Inc., Dva Laboratories Services and others
Relator:
Rey C. Patricia
Plaintiff:
The Common Wealth Of Massachusetts, The Commonwealth Of Virginia, The District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
State of New York v. Trump
as 18-488
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Citizens United, Citizens United Foundation, Public Advocate of the United States and others
Vidal v. Nielsen
as 18-485
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, on behalf of itself, its members, its clients, and all similarly situated individuals, Antonio Alarcon and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Amicus Curiae:
Citizens United, Citizens United Foundation, Public Advocate of the United States and others
State Of New York v. Pruitt et al
as 1:2018cv01030
Plaintiff:
State Of New York , State of California , State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
E. Scott Pruitt , United States Environmental Protection Agency , Ryan A. Fisher and others
Intervenor_defendant:
American Farm Bureau Federation , American Forest & Paper Association , American Petroleum Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lower East Side People's Federal Credit Union v. Trump et al
as 1:2017cv09536
Plaintiff:
Lower East Side People's Federal Credit Union
Defendant:
Donald John Trump and John Michael Mulvaney
Amicu:
Chris Dodd , Barney Frank , Sherrod Brown and others
Movant:
Susan Block-Lieb , Mark E. Budnitz , Prentiss Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
In Re: Kirstjen M. Nielsen
as 17-3345
Petitioner:
Kevin McAleenan, Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
In Re: Elaine Duke
as 17-3345
Petitioner:
Elaine C. Duke, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
Movant:
6Sense Insights, Inc., A Medium Corporation, Adobe Systems Incorporated and others
El-Bey v. District of Columbia et al
as 1:2017cv06203
Defendant:
County of Queens, District of Columbia, New York City Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Aristilde El-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State Of New York et al v. Donald Trump et al
as 1:2017cv05228
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Washington, State of New Mexico and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America, Donald Trump and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County (LASSMC), Service Employees International Union, African Services Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Arkansas et al v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01180
Plaintiff:
State of Arkansas , District of Columbia , State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Citron Pharma, LLC, Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
