Cases 91 - 100 of 63,394
Wesolek v. Erie County Holding Center et al
as 6:2024cv06340
Plaintiff:
Justin Wesolek
Defendant:
Erie County Holding Center, Eric County Sheriff Department, Kathy Hochul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Adanna et al
as 3:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
James Dixon
Defendant:
Adanna and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena v. Czeremcha et al
as 3:2024cv00938
Plaintiff:
James Pena
Defendant:
Czeremcha, Nick Rodriguez, Zack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredricks v. May et al
as 9:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredricks and Nigel Fredericks
Defendant:
C. May and John Doe Correction Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfonso v. Titus
as 6:2024cv06341
Petitioner:
Santiago Alfonso
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sutton v. Arroyo et al
as 2:2024cv03757
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Sutton
Defendant:
Sgt. Judy Arroyo, PO Ashley Raaf, PO Rooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Skinner v. Osborn Institution et al
as 3:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
Israel A. Skinner
Defendant:
Osborn Institution and Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Zimmerman et al
as 1:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Darnell Hicks
Defendant:
Captain Zimmerman, Ossining NY OVAC, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradbury v. City of Montpelier, VT et al
as 2:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Bradbury
Defendant:
City of Montpelier, VT and City of Montpelier, VT Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maas v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00967
Petitioner:
Adrian Maas
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
