Cases 11 - 20 of 415
Murphy v. New York City et al
as 1:2023cv05244
Plaintiff:
T-Jai Murphy
Defendant:
New York City, New York State and Jamaica Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cato v. Reardon
as 23-471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason E.T. Cato, AKA Jason Cato
Defendant / Appellee:
Patrick Reardon, Superintendent; Marcy Correctional Facility, Schneider, Deputy Superintendent; Marcy Correctional Facility, Murphy, Correction Officer; Marcy Correctional Facility and others
Booker v. Murphy
as 9:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Diquan Booker
Defendant:
Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01471
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Robinson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Scott Erfe, WIlliam Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cato v. Reardon et al
as 9:2022cv01173
Plaintiff:
Jason ET Cato and Jason Cato
Defendant:
Patrick Reardon, Schneider, Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Genesis Detox of Brooklyn LLC MSW IP et al
as 1:2022cv06568
Plaintiff:
David Murphy
Defendant:
Genesis Detox of Brooklyn LLC MSW IP and Monte Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Booker v. Flint et al
as 9:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
Diquan Booker
Defendant:
Flint, Murphy and Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colombe v. Murphy et al
as 9:2022cv00896
Plaintiff:
Gerald F. Colombe, III and Gerald F. Colombe
Defendant:
Jeffrey J. Murphy, John A. Winchell, LT Breyear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillon v. Rosen et al
as 1:2022cv07035
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Dillon
Defendant:
Harvey Rosen, James McQueeney, Esq., Bonnie Wittner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booker v. Flint et al
as 9:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Diquan Booker
Defendant:
Sgt. Flint, Officer Murphy and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
