Cases 41 - 50 of 144
McKnight v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv00696
Plaintiff:
Jamar McKnight
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Monica Rinaldi, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lenahan v. New York City et al
as 1:2017cv06734
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lenahan
Defendant:
New York City, N.Y.C. Department of Correction, N.Y.C. Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932
Bennett v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC
as 17-1011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald Bennett
Defendant - Appellee:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Individual & Officially, Chief Director Dr. Raul Ulloa, Chronic Care Dr. Delores Curbella and others
Walls v. Skinner et al
as 1:2017cv02409
Plaintiff:
De'mon Walls
Defendant:
Skinner, Correct Care Solutions, Kevin Cherverko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Cheverko et al
as 1:2017cv00790
Plaintiff:
Ruben M. Warren
Defendant:
Kevin M. Cheverko, Karl Vollmer, R. Omess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fabricio v. Lee et al
as 1:2016cv08731
Plaintiff:
Ederick Fabricio
Defendant:
W. Lee, T. Griffin, E. Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. DeBlasio et al
as 1:2016cv04519
Defendant:
Mayor Bill DeBlasio, Department of Corrections, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jones and Reginald Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Cons Sup Fargo Corp Osborn Int et al
as 3:2016cv01222
Plaintiff:
Steven Freytes Rivera
Defendant:
Cons Sup Fargo Corp Osborn Int, Robert Murphy, Pamela Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillip v. Racette et al
as 1:2016cv02228
Plaintiff:
Kevin Phillip
Defendant:
Steven E. Racette, Livermore and Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salley v. Keyser et al
as 1:2016cv01502
Plaintiff:
Sean Salley
Defendant:
William Keyser, Anthony Annucci, Kevin Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
