Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Home for the Aged of the Little Sisters of the Poor et al v. Basset
as 1:2021cv01384
Plaintiff:
Home for the Aged of the Little Sisters of the Poor, Home for the Age of the Little Sisters of the Poor of the City of NY Inc., Niagara Lutheran Development, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mary T. Bassett, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations LTD v. Sullivan
as 3:2016cv01087
Plaintiff:
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations LTD
Defendant:
Kevin B. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hudson River-Black River Regulating District v. Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L. P.
as 6:2014cv00173
Plaintiff:
Hudson River-Black River Regulating District
Defendant:
Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L. P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
New York Cruise Lines, Inc. et al v. Hudson River Park Trust
as 1:2013cv08145
Plaintiff:
New York Cruise Lines, Inc. , Circle Line Sightseeing Yachts, Inc. and World Yacht, LLC
Defendant:
Hudson River Park Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Community Health Care Associat v. New York State Department of H
as 13-3454
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Community Health Care Association of New York, Anthony L. Jordan Health Center, Community Health Center of Buffalo, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Health, State of New York and Does, 1-20
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Richard F. Daines, Medical Doctor, in his official capacity as Commissioner and Nirav R. Shah, Medical Doctor, in his official capacity as Commissioner
Community Health Care Associat v. New York State Department of H
as 13-3332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Community Health Care Association of New York, Anthony L. Jordan Health Center, Brooklyn Plaza Medical Center, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Health, Richard F. Daines, Medical Doctor, in his official capacity as Commissioner, Nirav R. Shah, Medical Doctor, in his official capacity as Commissioner and others
Community Health Care Associat v. New York State Department of
as 13-991
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Community Health Care Association of New York, Anthony L. Jordan Health Center, Bedford Stuyvesant Family Health Center, Inc. and others
Defendant:
State of New York, New York State Department of Health and Does 1-20
Defendant - Appellant:
M.D. Richard F. Daines, in his official capacity as Commissioner and M.D. Nirav R. Shah, in his official capacity as Commissioner
Community Health Care Associat v. New York State Department of H
as 13-771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Community Health Care Association of New York, Anthony L. Jordan Health Center, Bedford Stuyvesant Family Health Center, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Does 1-20
Defendant - Appellee:
M.D. Richard F. Daines, in his official capacity as Commissioner, New York State Department of Health and State of New York
Grand River Enterprises Six Na v. Pryor
as 12-840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Limited
Defendant - Appellee:
Troy King, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity, Talis Colberg, Attorney General of the State of Alaska, and is sued herein solely, in his official, representative capacity, Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity and others
Grand River Enterprises Six Na v. Pryor
as 11-1904
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Limited
Defendant - Appellee:
Troy King, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity, Talis Colberg, Attorney General of the State of Alaska, and is sued herein solely, in his official, representative capacity, Terry Goddard, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and is sued herein solely in his official, representative capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
