Cases 21 - 30 of 46
In Re: American Express Anti-S
as 20-580
Plaintiff:
National Supermarkets Association, Inc., on behalf of its membership, and all other similarly situated persons, Clam Lake Partners LLC, James Eaton and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cohen Rese Gallery, Inc., Lopez-Dejonge, Inc., Jasa, Inc., on behalf of themselves and others
Intervenor:
Circuit City Liquidating Trust, Gander Mountain Company, Holiday Companies and others
Defendant / Appellee:
American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc, and American Express Company
Defendant:
Susan Burdette
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P., et al
as 1:2019cv09999
Defendant:
Handa Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Astrazeneca L.P., Astrazeneca UK Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp.,, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
County of Rockland, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 7:2019cv05588
Plaintiff:
County of Rockland, New York
Defendant:
Cardinal Health Pharmacy Services, LLC, Purdue Pharma, Inc., CaremarkPCS Health, L.L.C. d/b/a CVS Caremark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra
City of Lackawanna, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv00485
Defendant:
SpecGX, LLC, Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Lackawanna, New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Gaminde v. Lang Pharma Nutrition, Inc.
as 19-927
Defendant / Appellee:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Lang Pharma Nutrition, Inc. and CVS Health Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Gaminde, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
The City of Rome, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 6:2019cv00376
Defendant:
Specgx, LLC, Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Rome, New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust
as 19-754
Plaintiff:
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council 21 Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, HEB Grocery Company L.P., Minnesota and North Dakota Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Health Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Teva Women's Health, Inc., FKA Duramed Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Barr Laboratories Inc., a Delaware Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Pipefitters Union Local NO 537 Health & Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, AGC-International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Welfare Plan of the International Union of Operation Engineers Locals 137, 137A, 137B, 137C, 137R, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Appellant:
People of the State of California
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., an Israeli Corporation
City of Geneva, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 6:2019cv06186
Defendant:
Specgx, LLC, Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Geneva, New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Allergan, Inc.
as 1:2018cv04566
Plaintiff:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
Allergan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re Novartis and Par Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2018cv04361
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Drogueria Betances, LLC, H-E-B LP, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc., Turlock Irrigation District and UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund
Respondent:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Lupin Ltd., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., OptumRX, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Caremark PHC, LLC and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
