Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 251
Litovich v. Bank Of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03154
Defendant: Natwest Markets Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Citigroup Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Isabel Litovich, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, Frank Hirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Gopu et al v. Luckin Coffee Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01747
Defendant: Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Luckin Coffee Inc., Hui Li and others
Plaintiff: Nirmala Gopu, Vijaya Gopu and Michael Bergenholtz
Petitioner: Mike Farhat, Boston Retirement System, Leonard Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In re: Frontier Communications
as 20-1161
Plaintiff / Appellee: Larisa Rosenberg, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, St. Lucie County Fire District Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund, On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated., Gene R. Wills and others
Defendant: Myron A.. Wick, III, Mark Shapiro, UBS Securities LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee: Donald W. Daniels, Edward Fraioli, Daniel J. McCarthy and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Carlos Lagomarsino and Arkansas Teacher Retirement System
Sterckx v. Luckin Coffee Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01677
Defendant: Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Luckin Coffee Inc., Hui Li and others
Plaintiff: Christophe Sterckx, Nirmala Gopu, Vijaya Gopu and others
Petitioner: Luckin Investor Group, Majid Hajizadeh Bashy, Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Gebbie v. Morgan Stanley Co., LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00435
Defendant: Morgan Stanley Co., LLC, Donald Trump, Netflix.com and others
Plaintiff: Christopher Lee Gebbie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. Bank of America Corporation
as 20-1086
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Nomura Holdings Inc., Royal Bank of Scotland plc and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: County of Washington, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Portigon AG and others
Plaintiff: County of Beaver, Pennsylvania, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Magnolia Regional Health Center, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, UNIQA Capital Markets GmbH, on behalf of UNIQA Dollar Bond and others
Appellant: Fortinbras Asset Management GmbH
Acerno v. Benchimol et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01502
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Julio Capua Ramos da Silva and others
Plaintiff: Joseph Acerno
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Van Hoomissen v. Yunji Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06479
Defendant: Wei Ying, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: Matthew Van Hoomissen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In Re: Petrobras Securities
as 19-3531
Defendant: Petrobras Global Finance B.V., BB Securities Ltd., Banco Bradesco BBI S.A. and others
Plaintiff: Forsta AP-fonden, Aberdeen International Equity Fund, Louis Kennedy, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Appellant: William Thomas Haynes, as Trustee for the benefit of W Thomas and Katherine Haynes Irrevocable Trust for the benefit of Sara L Haynes
Plaintiff / Appellee: North Carolina Department of State Treasurer, Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited and Employees Retirement System of the State of Hawaii
Mahmoud Latif v. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
as 19-2315
Defendant / Appellee: Morgan Stanley Services Group Inc., Carmen Gomez, Lily Chan and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Mahmoud Latif
Plaintiff: John Doe

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?