Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Schleyer et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2022cv10932
Plaintiff:
Eric Schleyer and Emilyn Mishkan
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Brownell v. Starbucks Coffee Company
as 5:2022cv01199
Plaintiff:
Kristie Brownell
Defendant:
Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Kominis v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2022cv06673
Plaintiff:
Joan Kominis and Jason McAllister
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Telesco v. Starbucks Corporation
as 7:2022cv02687
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Telesco
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 dtp Diversity - Deceptive Trade Practices
George et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2019cv06185
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Leach, Chelsea Maley, Lisa Jame and others
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Marten v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2018cv09201
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Juan Rafael Marten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Abramowitz et al v. Equifax Inc.
as 1:2017cv07642
Plaintiff:
Paige Abramowitz , Joe Falco , Maria Falco and others
Defendant:
Equifax Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abramowitz et al v. Equifax Inc.
as 7:2017cv07642
Plaintiff:
Jane Guzi Macedonia, Summer Nicole Starbuck, Phyllis Sternemann and others
Defendant:
Equifax Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Wessel v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 7:2017cv06703
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wessel
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation, Starbucks New Venture Company, PepsiCo, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harounian Rugs International Co., Inc. v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2015cv03949
Plaintiff:
Harounian Rugs International Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
