Cases 111 - 120 of 681
Rushing v. City MD
as 1:2022cv07339
Plaintiff:
Shaun Akindo Alexande Rushing
Defendant:
City MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kalarickal v. Department of Veteran Affairs
as 22-1666
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alexander Kalarickal
Defendant / Appellee:
Department of Veteran Affairs, (Agency), United States of America and Denis McDonough, Secretary
Pedotti v. Grand Lodge of the State of New York et al
as 1:2022cv06296
Defendant:
Anthony Damo, Grand Lodge of the State of New York, Joseph Passaretti and others
Plaintiff:
Holiday Oljii Anna Pedotti, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Wallace et al v. Mathis et al
as 5:2022cv00635
Plaintiff:
James Wallace and Barbara Wallace
Defendant:
Alexander Mathis and Town of Salina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oquendo v. Hartford et al
as 3:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Jorge Oquendo
Defendant:
City of Hartford, Abhilash Pillai, Michael Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtis v. Evans et al
as 6:2022cv06234
Plaintiff:
Alexander J. Curtis
Defendant:
Malik Evans, Ofc. Flint, Todd Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
