Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00793
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv04901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Perez v. Capers
as 17-1133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eric Perez
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert L. Capers, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney General Eastern District, Antoinette, Attorney General's Office Eastern District, Ms. Phelps, Assistant District Attorney Eastern District and others
Perez v. Capers et al
as 1:2017cv01391
Defendant:
Mr. Acosta, Cristina DeLeon Acosta, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beckford et al v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv07486
Plaintiff:
Tasha Beckford , Dawnette Beckford and Nicole Beckford
Defendant:
City Of New York, Sgt. "John" Chavez, P.O. "John" Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv09821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111
Solomon et al v. Kalish et al
as 1:2013cv05140
Defendant:
Melvin J. Kalish, Manatt, Phelps and Phillips, LLP and The Law Offices of Melvin J. Kalish, PLLC
Plaintiff:
Jane Solomon and Robert Solomon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv03244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Phelps v. Bank of America et al
as 6:2013cv06229
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Phelps
Defendant:
Bank of America and Country Wide Home Loans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
