Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Seals v. CUNY et al
as 1:2014cv06123
Plaintiff:
Tina Seals
Defendant:
CUNY, City College of New York, Debt Collection Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Seals v. McClurkin et al
as 1:2014cv05859
Plaintiff:
Tina Seals
Defendant:
Thomas "Tim" "Timothy" Crump McClurkin, Jane Doe Crump 1-?, John Doe Crump 1-? and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ratcliff v. Lighty et al
as 1:2014cv02704
Plaintiff:
Elijah W. Ratcliff
Defendant:
Donald Lighty, Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee, State Bar of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roberts v. Bexar County Sherriff's Department et al
as 3:2013cv00916
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Roberts
Defendant:
Bexar County Sherriff's Department, Jesus Ochoa, Ray Lujan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bravo v. Bexar County, TX et al
as 1:2012cv04009
Defendant:
Bexar County, TX, District Attorney's Office of Bexar County, TX, Hertz Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Louis A. Bravo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forjone v. The State of California
as 10-822
Plaintiff:
Wayne Mack, Dan DelPlato, Jr., Gabriel Razzano and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John-Joseph Forjone, the 42 USC 1983/Bivens/False Claims Act matter effecting the statewide distribution of HAVA funds requiring a 28 USC 2284 panel effecting New York Municipal People's equity in Bottom-up suffrage. Homerule autonomy and effecting real p
Defendant - Appellee:
The State of California, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of Oregon, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively, The State of New Mexico, each by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General respectively and others
Schulz et al v. State of New York et al
as 1:2007cv00943
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Schulz, Doug Bersaw, Amanda Moore and others
Defendant:
State of New York, State of New Hampshire, State of South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
