Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Weston v. USA
as 3:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
Keito Weston
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv09677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Civil Action for False Claims
Weston v. Sullivan et al
as 6:2012cv01893
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Weston, Sr.
Defendant:
Dan Patrick Sullivan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. New York State
as 12-1317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dona J. Jackson
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State, New York State Police, James W. McMahon, New York State Police Superintendent and others
El v. United States Government et al
as 11-2632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kwame Ozukata El
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Government, Attorney General of the State of New York, Weston United Community Renewal and others
Ozukata El v. United States Government et al
as 1:2011cv01613
Plaintiff:
Kwame Ozukata El
Defendant:
United States Government, Attorney General of the State of New York, Weston United Community Renewal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Magner et al v. Danbury et al
as 3:2010cv01819
Plaintiff:
William E. Magner, JR. , Magner Mgmt LLC and Union Memorial Mgmt LLC
Defendant:
City Of Danbury, Thomas Michael, Mitchell Weston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Peterson v. The New York City Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv07283
Plaintiff:
Barbara Peterson
Defendant:
The New York City Dept. of Corrections, Larry W. David, N.A. Velasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
