Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Fileccia v. City of New York
as 13-1138
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Robert J. Fileccia, Esq. and Richard Fileccia
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Walter E. Parks and Steven M. Reiss
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Daniel Donovan, District Attorney, William Murphy, Former District Attorney and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Emerson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv09225
Plaintiff:
Darrell Emerson
Defendant:
The City of New York, John O'Brien, Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Deno v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv08550
Plaintiff:
Emerson Deno
Defendant:
City of New York, Martin F. Horn, Carolyn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. The New York City Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv07283
Plaintiff:
Barbara Peterson
Defendant:
The New York City Dept. of Corrections, Larry W. David, N.A. Velasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roosa v. Och
as 10-3063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Charles Roosa
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark S. Ochs, Committee On Professional Standards, Steven D. Zayas and others
Roosa v. Ochs et al
as 3:2010cv00471
Plaintiff:
David Charles Roosa
Defendant:
Mark S. Ochs, Committee On Professional Standards, Steven D. Zayas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
