Cases 21 - 30 of 1,295
Scott v. DoorDash et al
as 1:2024cv01783
Plaintiff:
Felicia Scott
Defendant:
DoorDash, Uber and Instacart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Antar v. Grogins et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Auden Grogins, Scott Jones, Jane Grossman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MacDonald v. Great Neck Park District et al
as 2:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Scott MacDonald
Defendant:
Great Neck Park District, Frank S. Cilluffo and Jason Marra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hafner v. Scott et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
Phillip B. Scott, Charity R. Clark and Sarah Copeland Hanzas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brookins v. Napolitano et al
as 3:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Rev. Juan-Jose Brookins, Jawan Bey and Juan-Jose Brookins
Defendant:
Roberta Napolitano, Janet Yellen, Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Hart v. City of Middletown et al
as 7:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Marvin Hart
Defendant:
Marcelo Chasipanta, Scott M. Gallagher and City of Middletown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Walsh
as 8:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillip Lewis
Defendant:
Eileen Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lewis v. Essex County, New York et al
as 8:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillip Lewis
Defendant:
Essex County, New York, Town of North Elba, New York, Village of Lake Placid, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
