Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Toliver v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv11834
Defendant:
Project Renewal Anna's Place, Radulovick, Ms. Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Michel Toliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05373
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mendez v. Bridgeport et al
as 3:2019cv00853
Defendant:
Nathalie Mclaughlin, Adam Szeps, Kenneth Fortes and others
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02970
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2sh Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Francis v. Haner et al
as 1:2018cv03127
Plaintiff:
Everson R. Francis
Defendant:
Officer Haner, New York Port Authority, National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2006-1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv02732
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Henderson
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Police Officer Jabbar Bride, New York City Police Detective Marcos Vazquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Francis v. New York State et al
as 1:2018cv00113
Plaintiff:
Everson Francis
Defendant:
New York State, New Jersey State, Port Authority of New York New Jersey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Francis v. New York State
as 17-3557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Everson Francis
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State, Port Authority Police Department of New York & New Jersey, Port Authority of New York & New Jersey and others
Francis v. New York State et al
as 1:2017cv06321
Plaintiff:
Everson Francis
Defendant:
New York State, NJ/NY Port Authority Police, NJ/NY Port Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
