Cases 31 - 40 of 480
Williams II v. County of Onondaga
as 23-891
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles R. Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
County of Onondaga, County Attorney, City of Syracuse, City Attorney, Onondaga Co. D.A.'s Office, District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Miehle-Kellogg v. Doe
as 23-669
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terri Miehle-Kellogg, Administratrix of the Estate of Walter Kellogg, deceased and individually
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer John Doe, individually and in his capacity as a Police Officer of the Suffolk County Police Department, County of Suffolk and Suffolk County Police Department
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-606
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-465
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
