Cases 61 - 70 of 91
Telkamp v. Vitas Healthcare Corp. Atlantic et al
as 3:2015cv00726
Plaintiff:
Eloisa Gomez Telkamp
Defendant:
Vitas Healthcare Corp. Atlantic, Genesis HealthCare LLC, Lawrence & Memorial Hospital, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00918
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NYFD:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tepi et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv04956
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Tepi and Azucena Gallardo
Defendant:
Tamara Johnson, "Jane" Harris, David Trani and others
Cross_claimant:
Rose Mary Daniele
Cross_defendant:
City of New York , Gena Diacomanolis , "Jane" Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bouchard v. Hartunian et al
as 1:2014cv00752
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Bouchard
Defendant:
Richard S. Hartunian, Michael C. Olmsted, Tamara Thomson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv09041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Moore v. Harri
as 13-719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anisha Moore
Defendant:
New York Police Department
Defendant - Appellee:
Tamara Monet Harris and The Law Office of Tamara Harris
Ciulla-Noto v. Xerox Corporation
as 13-8
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tamara Ciulla-Noto
Defendant - Appellee:
Xerox Corporation
Harris v. Queens County District Attorne
as 12-3287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tamara Harris
Defendant - Appellee:
Queens County District Attorney's Office, Richard Brown, Esquire, Joan Ritter, Esq. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
