Cases 71 - 80 of 253
Doe et al v. Darien et al
as 3:2018cv01691
Defendant:
Gregory Doll, Mark Maybell, Darien Board of Education and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Mother Doe and Father Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv08733
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-2042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03364
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Graham et al v. HSBC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv04196
Plaintiff:
Iris Graham and Victor Graham
Defendant:
HSBC Mortgage Corporation, OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC and Stewart Title Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09237
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pejovic et al v. State University of New York at Albany et al
as 1:2017cv01092
Plaintiff:
Isidora Pejovic , Chae Bean Kang , Alba Sala Huerta and others
Defendant:
State University of New York at Albany and Mark Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05598
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Shimburski et al v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2017cv00699
Plaintiff:
Megan Shimburski , Makenna Shimburski , John Shimburski and others
Defendant:
Gregory McCarthy, Matthew Noecker, Jack Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.