Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Wilkens v. City of Stamford et al
as 3:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Samuel Wilkens
Defendant:
City of Stamford, Stamford Police Department, Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Broussard v. United Nations et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Brooke Marie Broussard Diplomat doing business as Infinite Light, LLC
Defendant:
United Nations, Mr. Stephen Mathias, Cheung Kong Hutchinson Holdings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Milhouse v. Hilton Garden Inn employees
as 23-1237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Muhammad E. Milhouse
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City Department of Homeless Services - DHS Employees, DHS COVID19 Isolation Process Responsibilities & Best Practices etc., John Doe/Jane Doe Site Supervisor NYCDHSDSSDHS COVID19 Isolation Site, John Doe/Jane Doe 24/7 Operation Staff/Housekeeping and others
Defendant:
Hilton Garden Inn employees, maintenance, security, housekeeping, front desk clerk et al, John/Jane Doe, Hilton Garden Inn employees until the police bring the defendant in so I can identify them all, Cleaning & Sanitizing Housekeeping Staff and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Palkimas v. Stamford et al
as 3:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Richard R. Palkimas and Richard Palkimas
Defendant:
City of Stamford, Chris Baker, Brendan Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
De Gaudemar et al v. Kosinski et al
as 1:2022cv03534
Plaintiff:
Belinda De Gaudemar, Anthony Hoffman, Susan Schoenfeld and others
Defendant:
Peter S. Kosinski, Douglas A. Kellner, Andrew J. Spano and others
Interested Party:
Tim Harkenrider, Guy C. Brought, Lawrence Canning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hobbs v. Lasco et al
as 1:2020cv00511
Defendant:
Judge Inlaw, Macy, Pension in Westchester County Gov't who decided if a litigant can proceed on forma pauperis and others
Plaintiff:
Richard P. Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
