Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
C.K. et al v. New York City Department of Education
as 1:2023cv02551
Plaintiff:
C.K. and C.K. on behalf of D.K., a minor
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
J. v. USA et al
as 3:2020cv00356
Defendant:
D.K. Williams, John Does, USA and others
Plaintiff:
E. J.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Salem et al v. Pompeo et al
as 1:2019cv00363
Plaintiff:
Z.A. (a minor child), Sallam Yahia Moflah Zandani, Sharaf Mohsen and others
Defendant:
Larry Edward Andre, Devin Kennington, U.S. Department of State and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Law Offices of H. Jeffrey Marcus, P.C. et al v. New York City Board of Education
as 1:2017cv05067
Plaintiff:
Law Offices of H. Jeffrey Marcus, P.C. , M.V. , D.M. and others
Defendant:
New York City Department Of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Johnson v. Raggi
as 16-2701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
D.K. Johnson, Attorney for self
Defendant - Appellee:
Judge Reena Raggi, in her individual and personal capacity
Johnson v. Raggi
as 1:2016cv02765
Plaintiff:
D.K. Johnson
Defendant:
Judge Reena Raggi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
D.K. et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv05045
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe and Jane Doe and Police Officer Omar Lewis
Plaintiff:
D.K. and K.T.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
