Civil Rights Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05050
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Cyrus v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv04115
Plaintiff: Odette K. Oliver Cyrus
Defendant: Lockheed Martin Corporation, Mr. Duane Baldwin, Mr. Douglas Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06607
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bass et al v. Dillard et al
as 6:2018cv06397
Plaintiff: Mandy M. Bass
Defendant: Deverald Dillard, Kiana Johnson Dillard and Joan S. Kohout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barlow v. Dillard et al
as 1:2017cv00500
Plaintiff: Clinton C. Barlow
Defendant: Christine Dillard, Chris Christie, Frank LaBelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04132
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04134
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jones v. Safi
as 12-4530
Plaintiff - Appellant: Robert Dillard Jones
Defendant - Appellee: Naziemul Safi, 141822 Putnam Avenue Corp., Orange Realty Corp. and others
Jones v. Safi et al
as 2:2010cv02398
Defendant: 14-18-22 Putnam Avenue Corp., City of New York Agencies, Debcon Financial Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Robert Dillard Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv06265
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?