Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Nastri v. Dykes
as 23-1023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David J. Nastri
Defendant / Appellee:
Katie Dykes, in her official capacity
Nastri v. Dykes
as 3:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
David J. Nastri
Defendant:
Katie Scharf Dykes and Katie Dykes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00736
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Willis et al v. County of Suffolket al
as 2:2017cv04582
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, County of Suffolk Department of Consumer Affairs, Leslie Dykes and others
Plaintiff:
R & V Home Remodeling of Long Island Corp. and Vernon T. Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dykes v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv03592
Plaintiff:
Kamesha Dykes
Defendant:
City of New York , Ali, Felix Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dykes v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv06088
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dykes
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe #1-4 and The City of New York
Shield #17025:
Police Officer Argelis Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fleming v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv02719
Defendant:
City of New York, Michelle Fernandez, Police Officer John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Rita Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riano v. Town of Schroeppel et al
as 5:2013cv00352
Plaintiff:
Brenda Riano
Defendant:
Town of Schroeppel , Town Board of the Town of Schroeppel , Patrick J. Nugent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv08354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
